Recently the Jeremy Vine show on BBC Radio 2 received a call from John in Manchester who Vine and the BBC labelled as an “antivaxxer.” John’s conversation with Vine was revealing. Not necessarily for the content, although John made some good points, but because it exposed the BBC for what they are: an agenda driven propaganda organisation.
Similar calls from Bristol based Nigel Jones to BBC Sounds’ Any Answers and a caller from Sussex to Sarah Gorrel’s BBC Radio Sussex phone in, exposed exactly the same bias from the BBC. This isn’t one or two talking heads going off script. It is corporate policy.
In all three cases, any questioning of the COVID 19 vaccines by the callers was met with the same response. Belligerent denial, logical fallacies, a refusal to rationally debate the evidence and, relatively swiftly, cutting them off.
The BBC aren’t alone of course. The MSM, as a whole, is a cohesive propaganda organisation. When Dr Zoe Williams started talking about vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia on Good Morning Britain she too was shut down. The ITV presenters hastily instructed to announce another weather report, as if this were a scheduling necessity
The first claim in the BBC mission statement is that they allegedly provide “impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them.” As we shall see, they don’t. The BBC have a very clear agenda and are in the businesses of promoting a single version of the truth. It is crucial to the BBC, and other propagandists like them, that you believe them. They claim:
“Trust is the foundation of the BBC. We’re independent, impartial and honest.”
The Oxford English Dictionary definition of “trust” is:
“Firm belief in the reliability, truth, or ability of someone or something… Acceptance of the truth of a statement without evidence or investigation.”
The “trust” that the BBC demand from their audience is not based upon their thorough investigations of the evidence, their objective reporting of the facts or their balanced opinion pieces. They beseech you to have faith in them as an organisation, simply because they are the BBC. You must believe them because they are the official purveyors of the official truth. It is self aggrandising bunk. They are just a media corporation like any other.
The inherent trustworthiness, claimed by the BBC, is asinine. Yet it seems millions are taken in by it, simply because the BBC keep claiming credibility that doesn’t appear to exist.
Did I mention that I am the most trusted blogger in the world. I consistently achieve the very highest standards of objectivity and impartiality. This isn’t true but so what? It seems just saying it is enough.
The BBC are governed by Royal Charter. They are not independent of the State, hence “State broadcaster.” Trusting the BBC is no different to trusting the political establishment, they are synonymous. The Charter is full of vacuous soundbites about independence, fairness and impartiality. The question is who judges that alleged “impartiality.”
The independent BBC board is controlled by the Secretary of State for the Department for Digital, Media, Culture and Sport (DCMS.) The Foreign Secretary also sets BBC objectives by stipulating their annual reporting requirements. The Scottish, Welsh and Northern Island ministers are likewise “consulted.”
The BBC are largely reliant upon the license fee. This is agreed by the Secretary of State under the The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004. The political establishment is literally the hand that feeds the BBC. It is ridiculous to suggest the BBC are “independent.” They are a State run, State managed, overtly political organisation.
Certainly when it comes to COVID 19, along with every other “regulated” broadcaster, the BBC are wholly controlled by the apparatus of State. The BBC are regulated by Ofcom and on 23rd March, just over a week after the WHO declared their global pandemic, Ofcom published their official Coranovirus Guidance. They decreed:
“We remind all broadcasters of the significant potential harm that can be caused by material relating to the Coronavirus…..We strongly advise you to take particular care when broadcasting….statements that seek to question or undermine the advice of public health bodies on the Coronavirus, or otherwise undermine people’s trust in the advice of mainstream sources of information about the disease…..Such views should always be placed into context and not be presented in such a way as to risk undermining viewers’ trust in official health advice….Ofcom will consider any breach arising from harmful Coronavirus-related programming to be potentially serious and will consider taking appropriate regulatory action, which could include the imposition of a statutory sanction.”
In other words the BBC, and other members of the mainstream broadcast media, are compelled by regulatory law to promote government COVID 19 policy and must not “undermine,” meaning question, the proclamations of the State or other “public health bodies,” such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Public Health England.
The BBC isn’t part of a free and pluralistic media, unafraid of questioning power. It is part of a State policy communication strategy which aims to convince the public to accept the authorised reality. Among these propagandist outlets the BBC is perhaps the most servile by virtue of its Charter and its reliance upon State funding.
The commercial broadcasters are also limited by Ofcom regulation and their dependence upon government advertising. The alleged pandemic saw the State become the UK’s leading advertiser. When we consider that their second biggest source of advertising revenue are the pharmaceutical corporations, the notion of an “independent” mainstream broadcast media in the UK is laughable.
It is set in this context that we should consider Vine’s betraying conversation with John from Manchester. When we do, the BBC agenda is laid bare.
The first thing to note is that John had to lie to get on the show. It was about so called “antivaxxers” who had supposedly come to regret their stance. Therefore John had to tell the researchers some porkies. Vine admonished him for this as he said that was not what the show was about.
This would be fair criticism if the BBC ever aired, or planned to air, a program which questioned the vaccines, perhaps highlighting the stories of the vaccine injured . There is no chance that the BBC will report facts like the lack of COVID vaccine clinical trials. They won’t question State narratives because they are a regulated propaganda organisation. The only way to be heard on their consciousness stream is to trick them into accidentally reporting your comments.
Vine’s first accusatory comeback was to try to undermine John’s opinion by pointing out that he did not accept the “science advice” alleging that 60,000 lives had been saved by the vaccines. Quite rightly, John did not accept these figures. The State claim that 60,000 lives have been saved by the vaccines is dross.
This is standard BBC fare. They report claims from government bodies like Public Health England (PHE) without any investigation whatsoever. Despite their pretensions of offering “a range and depth of analysis” using the “highest calibre presenters and journalists,” all the State need do is issue a statement and the BBC will dutifully report it, no questions asked.
PHE have used baseless estimates as the input to a model, constructed from a series of unsubstantiated assumptions, to produce a a projection of claimed efficacy, which then becomes the input to their own model. It is a statistical feedback loop. You don’t need to be a scientists to pull apart PHE’s farcical claims. Just reading the Cambridge Nowcast and Forecast model parameters would do:
“Assuming that it takes three weeks for vaccine-derived immunity to develop. Vaccine efficacy is assumed against both infection and death, using values for the efficacy in agreement with those found here.”
Where “here” refers to the PHE models which are…. er….. informed by the assumptions in the Nowcast and Forecast model, which in turn becomes the input for the PHE model it is itself based upon. It isn’t science, it’s not even bad statistical analysis, it’s just make believe.
Yet the BBC, with their multi billion pound budget, authoritatively report the PHE number salad as the “science advice” proving vaccine efficacy. The BBC are the best news organisation in the world, or so people keep saying. If they pronounce something it ostensibly becomes “fact” for millions. Can you see how this works?
As long as people trust the BBC and don’t question them, the State can simply feed propaganda into the machine and vacuous BBC mouthpieces will repeat it until you believe it. It washes over you like a heavy dose of soma, and none of it is even vaguely plausible.
The BBC’s own mission statement announces that they will “accurately and authentically.. raise awareness of the different.. viewpoints that make up its society.” These are just empty words. They have no intention of honouring this commitment.
John rightly highlighted the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency’s (MHRA’s) yellow card system. This has reported nearly 1,600 possible vaccine deaths and more than 1 million total adverse reactions. John was mistaken that these are proven vaccine deaths and Vine pounced upon this, saying:
“The yellow card system is a self reporting thing. No one has established the connection between the vaccines and any of those deaths yet, not a single one. It’s simply a reporting thing. If somebody has the vaccine and they are dead the next day, that’s reported but it doesn’t mean they died from it. Do you understand that?”
Vine was technically correct and appeared to feel he had made an irrefutable point proving his own argument. Listeners may have been convinced. This was disingenuous tripe form the BBC. As John immediately responded, exactly the same could be said for an unknown number of claimed COVID 19 deaths.
Just because someone tested positive for a virus and died the next day, it does not mean they died from it. Yet the BBC have reported every single claimed COVID death, within 28 or even 60 days of a positive test, as if that were true. It most certainly is not. Yet, were it not for concerned citizens like John, they would never fairly report a single potential vaccine related death.
The BBC need to propagandise runs so deep that they can’t even investigate properly when one of their own colleagues dies from a vaccine injury. Given the yellow card statistics were reporting more than 1,400 deaths when Lisa Shaw sadly passed away, you would have though the BBC would have launched an investigation. This is exactly what a real news organisation would do. It is not what the BBC did.
Doing so could undermine “viewers’ trust in official health advice.” Rather than apply any journalistic standards, and question why the MHRA aren’t investigating the mounting death toll, the BBC simply reported unfathomable apparent comments from Lisa’s widower that the jabs were “outstanding.” They didn’t even mention the yellow card system in the report of her death.
When John confronted the BBC with this evidence, their corporate response was to spread disinformation and downplay it. The scant disregard they showed for the victims families means nothing to them. They are propagandists and couldn’t care less about the people, not even their own staff.
The BBC have persistently asserted that a positive RT-PCR test defines a “case” of COVID 19. This is disinformation.
If you test positive for varicella-zoster virus it does not mean you have Shingles. They have consistently reported an unremitting stream of scientifically illiterate garbage to the public and have failed to abide by a single one of their fatuous mission statement objectives.
Vine’s condescending triumphalism was misplaced. While it is true there is no “proof” that these deaths were caused by the vaccine, nor is there any that they were not. That would require an investigation of the evidence, something which the MHRA have not undertaken in a single case. We might wonder if the BBC “understand that.”
Vines spurious claim that the yellow card system is simply “a reporting thing,” leaves the public he casually deceives with the impression that the system is meaningless. There is some truth in that. If the MHRA don’t use it as intended it becomes nothing but a black hole for victims and their families to scream into. Nonetheless, according to the MHRA:
“The scheme relies on voluntary reporting of suspected safety concerns or incidents by healthcare professionals and members of the public.. The purpose of the scheme is to provide an early warning that the safety of a product may require further investigation.. By reporting through this site, patients and healthcare professionals can help gather valuable evidence to inform decisions on the safe and effective use of medicines, vaccines and medical devices “
Vine may imagine it is for telling stories but that’s probably because he was regurgitating whatever his editor told him to say. It’s an early warning system which the MHRA spent £1.5 million upgrading in October 2020, just before the vaccine roll out, for what they said were the “the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reactions.”
According to the BBC and Vine, they undertook this expensive system overhaul for a few sore arms. In reality it was because it was “not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine.”
Obviously the MHRA were anticipating a high volume of COVID vaccine Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs.) As there seem to be millions of them recorded on the yellow card system, including people suffering seizures, paralysis, blindness and many fatalities, the BBC should investigate this and report their findings. However, that isn’t really their role, so they hide the purpose of the yellow card system and pump out “fake news” instead.
The MHRA have already stated that the system is prone to massive under recording of ADRs. So John’s estimate of thousands of COVID 19 vaccine related deaths is almost certainly accurate. We won’t know until they are investigated but, with the MHRA in charge and the BBC covering for them, any chance of that happening appears remote.
For Vine and the BBC it is essential that you don’t know about or understand any of this. That’s why they never report it, don’t investigate any of the thousands of vaccine injury reports, never inform the public about the raft of scientific papers that raise serious concerns about the vaccines and instead mislead, misdirect, spread disinformation and propagandise the population.
While John from Manchester tried to highlight these “facts” to a UK audience, Vine decided that responding with drivel was insufficient. He felt it was necessary, or was more likely instructed, to throw in some logical fallacies too.
He chose the “appeal to authority” fallacy to start with, asking John if he was a qualified scientist. John stated he wasn’t but had researched the science for himself and so Vine doubled up and used the straw-man fallacy as well. He claimed John had said the scientists were all lying, which he hadn’t.
Vine’s “appeal to authority” is automatically an invalid argument because simply claiming that “experts say” doesn’t exempt you from critical thinking and is no dialectical trump card. Vine isn’t a qualified scientists either so what makes him think his grasp of the science is any better than John’s?
Vines accusation that John wasn’t an epidemiologist was jaw dropping. The BBC don’t care about qualifications and will misreport them whenever they want to convince the public of their selected expert’s credentials.
Throughout the 2020 phase of the so called pandemic, the BBC incessantly reported the opinions and wildly inaccurate models of Professor Neil Ferguson, habitually referring to him as an epidemiologists. Ferguson is not a a qualified epidemiologist. He has no qualifications in the biological sciences at all. Yet that didn’t stop the BBC espousing every inaccurate statement and woeful prediction he made as if it were pandemic lore.
The BBC use of “appeal to authority” is even less edifying when we understand that they completely ignore huge swathes of scientific opinion simply because it doesn’t fit in with the narrative they have been told to foist on the public. John quite correctly pointed this out to Vine and the BBC so they cut him off.
This is an essential tool of the propagandists. They highlight everything which supports their agenda and ignore or, where needed, flatly deny the existence of anything and everything which challenges it.
This is precisely what the BBC have done throughout, what I refer to, as the pseudopandemic. Vine wasn’t misrepresenting the BBC. In a brief moment of clarity he personified them. There is no objective difference between the BBC and Soviet era Central Television or Lord Haw Haw demoralising terrorised Blitz sufferers. The BBC are a disgrace.
You only need to buy a TV license if you absolutely must watch live broadcast television. As someone who hasn’t owned a TV for decades I can’t really understand why you would want to. However, if you continue paying it you should understand what you are paying for.
You are paying for your propaganda. You are forking out to be lied to, showered with disinformation, misled and psychologically manipulated, primarily through the use of utterly preposterous fear porn. People often wonder what they can do to resist this onslaught by the State. Well, you could stop paying them for the privilege if you like.
Please consider supporting my work. I really need your help if I am going to continue to provide the research and analysis that you value on a full-time basis. You can support my work for less than the price of a cup of coffee via my donor page or alternative become a paid subscriber to my Substack.
I extend my gratitude to my editor, who has provided invaluable contributions to my articles since October 2021 (but who, for personal reasons, prefers to remain anonymous).
Please feel free to share anything from iaindavis[.]com excluding any and all third party content. I use a Creative Commons License. All I ask is that you give credit to the author and clearly mark any changes you make. Please share my work widely. Censorship is increasing and we need to get this information out there. If you value what I do then please consider supporting my work. Many thanks.
True History of the BBC CONCLUSION Our modern mass communications world is run by spies.
These immoral people have manipulated our governments and modern life from their “private” office suites at CNN, NBC, BBC, Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, The Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Facebook, Google, Alphabet, YouTube, Instagram, Yahoo!, Twitter, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Halliburton, PayPal, Palantir, Symantec, Cloudflare, Entrust, L3, AT&T, IBM, Microsoft, Dell, Apple, Verizon, Atlantic Crossing, Orange, British Telecom, Deutsche Telecom, Nokia, Broadcom, Qualcomm, etc.
These people have convinced themselves that they alone are worthy of creating public opinion. They admit to starting and stopping war with propaganda.
As a result, our public morality has been heavily dictated to by totally evil people, attorneys, bankers, technologists, judges and academicians who only know how to lie for a living.
This is the consciousness that has poisoned world culture for over 120 years of world culture.
They have been directly responsible for the slaughter of over 216 million souls in wars and perhaps 60 million pre and post birth infanticides, in the name of population reduction.
Just look at the horrific mess they have created.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2019
STUNNING REVELATIONS PROVE MEDIA IS MUCH MORE DANGEROUS THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE
HARD EVIDENCE HOW MEGALOMANIAC NEWSPAPERMEN HAVE POLLUTED OUR MODERN CULTURE
https://TINYURL.COM/YYPREMBY
Listen to Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel discuss this blockbuster report before diving into all of the primary evidence (below) the AFI researchers uncovered.
https://tinyurl.com/nxv98r6a
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today https://tinyurl.com/yypremby CONTRIBUTING WRITERS | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | SEP. 12, 2019, SEP. 13, 2019 | PDF https://tinyurl.com/4wmbpvh3
2019
(SEP. 12, 2019)—Prominent members of the 117-year old Pilgrims Society (1902)—a secretive group of self-styled UK-U.S. elitist Anglophile white supremacists—are listed in convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s “Little Black Book.”
Henry Kissinger (p.31), Larry Summers (“Lolita Express” Flight Manifests), Rupert Soames, OBE (p.50), Baron Conrad Black (p. 06) and Duke of York Andrew Windsor (p.16) are in Epstein’s contact book.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (JAN. 15, 2015).https://tinyurl.com/4unc75ax JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S LITTLE BLACK BOOK, UNREDACTED, 92 PGS., EXHIBITS_STM_UNDISPUTED_FACTS-PDF. U.S. COURTS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (JUL. 06, 2019).https://tinyurl.com/7bdu987e EPSTEIN FLIGHT MANIFESTS, EXHIBIT MM, EPSTEIN V. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ET AL, CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG, ALSO EPSTEIN, JEFFREY V. ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT. U.S. COURTS.
.
https://tinyurl.com/7bdu987e
Our investigation has uncovered a sociopathic Pilgrim Society world takeover plan in which Kissinger, Summers, Soames, Black and Windsor are disciples.
How they have managed to pull this off is a separate question. We will focus on what they have done.
QUESTION: WHAT DO THESE MEN HAVE IN COMMON?
ANSWER: THE PILGRIMS SOCIETY MEMBERSHIP + PEDOPHILE EPSTEIN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Kissinger and Prince Andrew are well known, but Soames, Black and Summers less so.
1909
ACCORDING TO PILGRIM SOCIETY PRESS RELEASES, THEY JUST DO BANQUETS AND AWARDS. RIGHT? WRONG.
ALL ROADS LEAD BACK TO FLEET STREET, CITY OF LONDON, UK IN 1909
On July 29, 1909, the British Prime Minister Asquith, in a conspiracy with the Pilgrims Society (and its junior varsity recruiting feeder the English-Speaking Union) secretly recruited the leading newspapermen of the Empire, including their London bureau chiefs for the U.S. press, to form his intelligence agencies MI5, MI6 and GC&CS (renamed GCHQ)
IN BRITAIN: The Anglo-American White Race https://tinyurl.com/2f98akks rules through such institutions as The Crown, Privy Council, Crown Agents, English-Speaking Society of Great Britain, Fleet Street, MI5, MI6, GCHQ, BBC, SERCO, European Union, BAE, endless Charity fronts, intertwined corporations and The City of London UK.
PILGRIM SOCIETY IS THE “DEEP STATE”
The Pilgrim Society has meticulously carried out Cecil Rhodes’ 1910 instructions to use Jesuit-like stealth and secrecy to achieve the goal of Anglo-American White Race dominance over the world. They are still at it as we speak. It became British Government policy by attrition, payoffs, pedophilia and peerage, and American Government policy by secret takeover of our agencies by the Senior Executive Service (SES). Today its generic name the “Deep State” and “shadow government.”
HOW DID WE ARRIVE AT THIS COMPROMISE OF WORLD AFFAIRS, COMMUNICATIONS AND CULTURE?
However, to understand the world in which the Pilgrim Society was creation, we must first examine some of the major world forces shaping this period, especially the emergence of corporate “robber baron” monopolies in banking, mining and technology.
1940-1946
Now we will jump to the midway point in this 117-year saga for more context.
BRITISH & AMERICAN PILGRIMS CONSPIRED IN 1940 TO STEAL OVER 50,000 PATENTS AND FREELY GIVE THEM TO THEMSELVES; “FIVE EYES” ANGLO-AMERICAN (PILGRIMS) SPY AGENCY FORMED IN 1946
BRITISH WAR PROPAGANDA BUREAU (1914-1916), SUCCEEDED BY THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION (PROPAGANDA) (1916-DEC. 20, 1918) PDF https://tinyurl.com/us4pvzux
RHODES’ RELATIVE CHARLES F.G. MASTERMAN WAS THE LYNCH-PIN BETWEEN THE PILGRIMS SOCIETY AND NEWSPAPER PROPAGANDA
1901-1902
With the evident connections among wireless technology, propaganda, eugenics, intelligence and mass surveillance now established, we must look more closely now at the sequence of events in 1902. Hindsight shows that they were meticulously planned..
THE BOER WARS WERE FALSE FLAGS TO CONSOLIDATE AFRICAN WEALTH FOR IMPERIAL CORPORATIONS
ON JUL. 16, 1902, PDF https://tinyurl.com/s57p93td THE PILGRIMS SOCIETY WAS FORMED. SIR HARRY BRITTAIN WAS NAMED CHAIRMAN. GENERAL LORD FREDERICK ROBERTS (2ND BOER CONCENTRATION CAMP FOUNDER) WAS NAMED PRESIDENT.
Other founding members were Lord Burnham (Edward Levy-Lawson), owner of The Daily Telegraph; Burnham’s son Harry Levy-Lawson; Lord Northcliffe, owner of The Daily Mail, The Times, The Daily Mirror, Sunday Dispatch, Observer, The Sunday Times, The Children’s Encyclopedia and Harmsworth’s Universal Encyclopedia.
The Pilgrims first set up in London, got organized, then started their New York chapter on January 13, 1903. They made the British and American memberships reciprocal, meaning if you were a member in Britain, you were automatically an American member without additional membership requirements.
Only self-anointed elitists could join or be patrons of the Pilgrims Society,
PDF https://tinyurl.com/46pejnrk and join they did. J.P. Morgan, Jacob Astor, John D. Rockefeller, Prescott Bush, Andrew Carnegie, Rothschild, Viscount Alfred Milner, Lord Burnham, Lord Edward Levy-Lawson, His Majesty Edward VII (Windsor), Sir Stewart Menzies, H.G. Wells, J.P. Morgan, Thomas W. Lamont, Thomas J. Watson (IBM), Baring, Rockefellers, Winston Churchill, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Neville Chamberlain, Forbes, Knights of Malta, Rudyard Kipling, as well as many viscounts, dukes, earls, barons, lords and knights, etc.
The Pilgrim Society’s first president, 2nd Boer War General Lord Frederick Roberts, had previously been a lieutenant in the British East India Company Army.
In fact, Cecil Rhodes’ property in Cape Colony had been owned by the British East India Company’s. This army was separate from the regular British Army. It had its own administration and much better global intelligence. The British Army was working to absorb and disempower this network, but had a haphazard network of agents at best.
By 1909, the Pilgrims Society was well organized in both Britain and America. On the surface, they gathered innocently for dinners and social events. Often times the British monarch would attend or send his greetings. However, the devil is in this detail. Over drinks and cigars, they plotted in secret how best to carry out the Cecil Rhodes vision of an Anglophile world government.
Their membership by 1909 included Astor, Morgan, Chase, Carnegie, Rothschild, Chamberlain, Churchill, Milner, Heinz, Schiff, Buchan, Burnham, Levy-Lawson, Forbes, Northcliffe, Rockefeller, Smuts, Kennedy, Dupont, Roberts, Curzon, Dillon, Vanderbilt, Mark Twain, Taft, Lamont, Windsor, etc.
1909
THE DAY THE MODERN WORLD WAS INTRODUCED TO FAKE NEWS AND MEDIA-CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE
On Jun. 05, 1909, Pilgrim founders Sir Harry Brittain and Lord Burnham (Sir Edward Levy-Lawson) organized a 650-person Imperial Press Conference, 1909 at Shepherds Bush, White City, PDF https://tinyurl.com/vkhpu5p2 in London’s West End.
The 1909 conference site is the current home of BBC TV Centre. The themes of the conference were “Parliament of the Press” and “The Evolution of Journalism Etcetera.”
Speaker after speaker extolled the virtues of British imperialism, the supremacy of the white race to control the world, the right of the white race to organize the world and its resources, and most notably, the imperative that newspapers CREATE public opinion as the only way to have lasting peace.
The delegates were given three documents totaling over 1,271 pages—all or mostly all underwritten by the big pharmaceutical and chemical giant Burroughs Wellcome.
(1) “Parliament of the Press”—a fully illustrated record of the proceedings, 248 pgs. (Editor’s Note: This is a rare book since only a few thousand copies were printed. Strangely, the Wellcome Trust Library archives appears not to have saved it like they did the other two. A copy has been located and will be processed, hopefully within a week of this post, so check back in a few days!). Many historians and journalists cite this book, so its contents are well known.
(2) “Evolution of Journalism Etcetera” PDF https://tinyurl.com/djjsufds —Full-page portraits and biographies of Britain’s leading newspapermen and writers, promotion of Burroughs Wellcome & Co offerings in chemistry and pathology in great scientific detail, 371 pgs. Bizarrely, a wide array of Burroughs Wellcome vaccines, chemicals, medical boxes and cures for pathogens ranging from typhoid fever and the plague to acne vaccines (that do not exist to this day) were presented. On the surface, this mix of journalism and vaccines and chemicals made no sense, until we investigated Burroughs Wellcome’s role in British eugenic policy and their desire to take out their chief pharmaceutical and chemical competitor: Germany.
(3) “Souvenir Guide to London”—An overblown illustrated cursory romp through the history of Britain and Empire, conveniently leaving out the unflattering episodes. It was a 652 page entertainment and propaganda guide for the President of the Board of Trade at the time—Winston Churchill.
IN HINDSIGHT, THE TRUE PURPOSE OF THE IMPERIAL PRESS CONFERENCE, 1909 WAS TO RECRUIT NEWSPAPERMEN FROM ACROSS THE EMPIRE TO FORM THE NEW BRITISH INTELLIGENCE SERVICES HOME DEFENCE (MI5), COLONIAL DEFENCE (MI6) AND INTELLIGENCE ARCHIVING (GC&CS, RENAMED GCHQ)
Why? The Pilgrim Society’s first president, 2nd Boer War General Lord Frederick Roberts—the criminal behind the world’s first modern mass extermination concentration camp—had previously been a lieutenant in the British East India Company Army. In fact, Cecil Rhodes’ property in Cape Colony had been the British East India Company’s. This army was separate and often in competition with the regular British Army. It had its own administration and much better global intelligence. The British Army was working to absorb and disempower this network, but had no network of agents to replace it.
Therefore, the real purpose of the Imperial Press Conference, 1909 was to start Military Intelligence MI5, MI6 and GC&CS with newspapermen from across the British Empire and America. It was a ready-made global information network ripe for subversion.
On Jun. 05, 1909, the conference held a kickoff banquet.
On Jun. 07, 1909, some 50 delegates were hosted at a “Imperial Press Conference, 1909. Luncheon Party at the House of Commons, June 7th.” See also Fig. 1 above.
The organizers who were led by Lord Burnham pampered the delegates, many of whom wrote gushingly about British hospitality. Many were given high level access to British officials and celebrities which would be news in itself and force them to write themselves into the news about the fine treatment.
The speeches all pointed to the need for more unified Empire communications and intelligence (via wireless). They wrote about the solemn duty of Empire newspapermen to provide the leadership.
Guglielmo Marconi, the faked British Government inventor of wireless, even proposed in one of the closing speeches to set up a global “Marconigram” system.
Behind the scenes, Brittain, Burnham, Milner, Buchan and others were meeting with Prime Minister Asquith and Churchill (president of the Board of Trade, then Home Secretary, then First Lord of the Admiralty).
THE SECRET 1909 ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIM SOCIETY PLOT FOR THEIR NEWSPAPERMEN MEMBERS TO BE THE WORLD’S SPIES
These men were secretly plotting how newspapermen were the best positioned around the Empire to keep the Prime Minister supplied with accurate intelligence at now wireless speeds. Fig. 1 shows one of their official meetings at the Parliament on Jun. 07, 1909.
The Conference ended on Saturday, Jun. 26, 1909. Just prior to the close of the conference.
On Jun. 23, 1909, selected delegates met to form the Empire Press Union which was to be a “permanent body” to carry forward the work of the Conference. It was organized and staffed by Pilgrims Society members. Lord Burnham (Edward Levy-Lawson) its first president.
On Jun. 26, 1909, the Imperial Press Conference ended having formed the Empire Press Union to carry forward their vision to create public opinion.
“Welfare Work and A Time for Play.” Henry S. Wellcome. (Jun. 05, 1909). PDF https://tinyurl.com/dbjz6vkx THE EVOLUTION OF JOURNALISM ETCETERA, Souvenir of the INTERNATIONAL PRESS CONFERENCE, LONDON, 1909, Hon. President Lord Burnham (Sir Edward Levy-Lawson, Baron, The Daily Telegraph), p. 322. Burroughs Wellcome.
PATHOGENS AND THE SPY PRESS
Curiously, no historian we have reviewed mentions these lavishly produced Burroughs Wellcome Imperial Press Conference, 1909 books.
1922-1929
BBC WAS WEAPONIZED FROM DAY 1; AS WERE RCA & NBC (ALL THREE CONTROLLED BY GE)
The Empire Press Union’s fingerprint on the BBC, RCA and NBC is unmistakable.
The BBC predates RCA and NBC and set the standard for how radio, TV (and now Internet) would be operated as pure media-spy intelligence that would be sold to the British and American Governments if they followed their quid pro quo wishes.
Rhodes’ biographer W.T. Stead PDF https://tinyurl.com/etr3fmn3 wrote in 1902:
“MR. RHODES WAS COLOUR-BLIND BETWEEN THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC … IN HIS WILL HE AIMED AT MAKING OXFORD UNIVERSITY THE EDUCATIONAL CENTRE OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING RACE … A SECRET SOCIETY ORGANISED LIKE LOYOLA’S [JESUIT], SUPPORTED BY THE ACCUMULATED WEALTH.”
That accumulated wealth, run by Pilgrim Society newspapers, still rules through secrecy, intelligence, money laundering, drug trafficking, influence peddling, pedophilia and Satanism to this very day.
The Pilgrim Society through its Empire Press Union (renamed the Commonwealth Press Union and now CPU Trust) controlled all six companies who first invested in the BBC.
They are:
(1) GE (included RCA from 1932, now SERCO),
(2) Western Electric (now AT&T, Lucent, Nokia),
(3) British Thomson-Houston (now GE),
(4) Radio Communications (now BAE),
(5) Marconi Wireless (then GE, now BAE),
(6) Metropolitan-Vickers (then GE, then Marconi, now BAE).
All military and intelligence, all the time.
On Sep. 10, 1929, RCA Photophone LIMITED was registered in The City of London UK with two shares, one British and one American.
The name was changed to RCA GREAT BRITAIN LIMITED on May 14, 1956.
The name was changed again to RCA LIMITED on Mar. 03, 1969.
The name was changed yet again to SERCO LIMITED on Jul. 29, 1987, which it remains to this day.
This brings us now back to SERCO and Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and Rupert C. Soames, OBE.
We have investigated the nefarious SERCO and Rupert C. Soames thoroughly. Here are links to previous posts:
AFI. (Apr. 20, 2018). The shadow government uses SES, Serco and OPIC as portals into horrific corruption. Americans for Innovation.
AFI. (May 16, 2018). SES SERCO “wet-ware” soft kill plan is happening, but can be stopped: Defund them, now! Americans for Innovation.
AFI. (Jun 03, 2018). SPY-GATE PART I: [Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie] Spy-Gate is directed by the Crown’s courtiers [Privy Council] in the UK, not by Russia. Americans for Innovation.
AFI. (Jul. 20, 2018). SPY-GATE PART II: Lord Mark Malloch-Brown – The globalist racketeer kingpin running the Queen’s Privy Council with George Soros. Americans for Innovation.
We have come full circle back to the current CEO of SERCO is Rupert M. Soames, OBE who is a member of the Pilgrim Society and listed in Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black book.
THE MSM MEDIA IS INFESTED WITH SPIES WHO ONLY KNOW HOW TO LIE
One can easily see that from the beginning, the British Pilgrims were determined to intertwine their media operations called MI6, MI5 and GC&CS so tightly into American media and C.I.A., FBI and NSA that it would be a Gordian knot of Pilgrim Society interconnections that could not be unraveled … until it was too late to stop them.
THE SCENE OF THE CRIME
Tellingly, the BBC housed itself in 1922, and to this day, at the scene of the devil’s great crime—The Imperial Press Conference, 1909—at Shepherds Bush, White City in London’s West End. BBC Television Central produces radio, TV and movies in more than 15 studios there today.
VISCOUNT BURNHAM: PRESS PROPAGANDA HAS THE POWER TO DECLARE WARS, AND END THEM
THE SCENE OF THE CRIME
Tellingly, the BBC housed itself in 1922, and to this day, at the scene of the devil’s great crime—The Imperial Press Conference, 1909—at Shepherds Bush, White City in London’s West End. BBC Television Central produces radio, TV and movies in more than 15 studios there today.
VISCOUNT BURNHAM: PRESS PROPAGANDA HAS THE POWER TO DECLARE WARS, AND END THEM
On Jan. 27, 1923, PDF https://tinyurl.com/vw72vb2m Viscount Burnham (Jr.), whose father was the founder and owner of The Daily Telegraph since 1855, founding member of the Pilgrim Society, organizer of Imperial Press Conference, 1909 and founder of the Empire Press Union, told the Associated Press:
“We are responsible among us for most of the influences which form the opinion and determine the conduct of the world. Whether we like it or not we are responsible for a large part of the life of the world. If by any coincidence you could assemble in one room the directors and editors of the world’s newspapers, and they were to agree—which I grant you is almost inconceivable—to proclaim peace, there would be peace, but if they were to declare war, war there assuredly would be.”
https://tinyurl.com/22nwzj57
UNREDACTED EPSTEIN’S BLACK BOOK 95 PAGES WORTH https://tinyurl.com/tkm848ey
A wealth of information. Thanks. I do hope others will follow the links you have shared.
UK Gov Accused of Intentionally Murdering People Who Supposedly Died of CV19
https://tinyurl.com/3f3zzyrn
The People’s Union of Britain the only Union that takes back sovereignty
Update of Prosecution
The Timeline of the Prosecution starting from the latest update
PUB v Hancock & Others |01-08-21
UK Government Policy Turned Care Homes Into Death Camps
Over the course of the past eighteen months, it has become chillingly apparent to myself and the rest of the team who have been amassing prima facie evidence of genocidal fraud against the Four Horsemen and their accomplices that UK Government policy effectively turned Britain’s care homes into death camps, where the over 65’s, the sick and the disabled were dispatched with lethal doses of Midazolam and Morphine.
As the new updated criminal court papers entered the final stages of preparation, on Saturday morning we received a copy of a formerly confidential UK Government report written in July 2017, known as the Pandemic Influenza Briefing Paper.
This has transpired because of a successful FOI request for the information be made public, for the purposes of which, here lies a brief summary of the damning paper.
Suspension of Care
In section 4.4 of the UK Government’s briefing paper, the following were earmarked for prioritising within the NHS, in the event of a ‘pandemic’, under the heading Primary Care Suspensions and Priorities:
Managing infections such as Sepsis, Cellulitis, Meningitis and Influenza.
Acute and urgent illnesses and trauma, such as fractures and acute abdominal pain.
Palliative, Pain Management and End of Life Care.
Conversely, in the list marked for suspension were:
All routine Dentistry and Optometry services.
Management of Chronic Disease.
Low level Mental Health Care [including treatment of patients with Learning Difficulties].
Routine Diabetes Screening.
Musculoskeletal Care.
Preventative Care [including ‘vaccination’, which is the only element of the plan which was not implemented in March 2020 by the UK Government, upon the advice of Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson].
Dementia Diagnosis and Old Age / Frailty Management.
Decision Making
In section 5.0 on Decision Making, the briefing paper summarizes how the process of deciding when the suspension of the foregoing services and treatments would take place, as well as who would be denied them:
The Secretary of State for Health and other Ministers will be asked to decide that population triage can be enacted. This will allow NHS England to allow clinicians in local hospitals to make appropriate decisions about providing care to those patients who will benefit the most in a situation where the system is under extreme and unprecedented pressure.
The request for such a decision will be informed by insight from NHS England, NHS Improvement, the frontline and DH, as well as specialist advisory bodies established in response to a pandemic. Consideration will need to be taken as to whether such a decision is made at England level or nationally across all four UK countries.
Such a decision to move to population triage will effectively be an extension of the usual routine and daily clinical decisions made by clinicians regarding admissions and discharges. However, rather than decisions being made on a basis of triage by clinical outcome, triage by resource availability will also inform the decision.
From which we can easily glean that Matt Hancock [when he was still the secretary of state for the DHSC] and the government ministers in the Cabinet Office were asked to enact ‘Population Triage’ upon the advice of NHS England, NHS Improvement, civil servants within the DHSC and SAGE [which naturally included Neil Ferguson, Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance].
Furthermore, the section also states that clinical decisions by clinicians on matters of admission and discharge would be based upon the treatment / service resources available, rather than ‘a basis of triage by clinical outcome’.
Ethics
Section 5.1 of the report states that the ethical framework underpinning the policies recommended was developed https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pandemic-flu by the Committee on Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Influenza and published by the Department of Health in 2007 as guidance for dealing with ‘Pandemic Flu’, which in turn states that:
Equal concern and respect is the fundamental principle that underpins the ethical framework. This means that:
* everyone matters
* everyone matters equally – but this does not mean that everyone is treated the same
* the interests of each person are the concern of all of us, and of society
* the harm that might be suffered by every person matters, and so minimising the harm that a pandemic might cause is a central concern
* The ethical framework section was developed by the Committee on Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Influenza and first published in 2007. It was revised by the Department of Health and Social Care in 2017.
In other words, whilst the framework insists that ‘everybody matters’, that ‘the harm suffered by every person matters’ and that ‘the harm that might be suffered by every person matters’, it also inserts the fatal caveat that this ‘does not mean that everyone is treated the same’.
Which is another way of saying that the harm suffered by some people [the over 65’s] is less important than the suffering endured by other people [the under 65’s]; which is akin to implicitly targeting a specific section of the population for elimination by denial of critical treatments and services.
Deactivation of Care & Expansion of ‘Good Deaths’
In a table called Activation and Deactivation of Primary and Secondary Care Activities, the briefing paper lays out the detailed plan for dealing with every aspect of every severity level of any kind of ‘pandemic’, in which it is stated that in the event of a moderate outbreak, End of Life Facilities should be supported and expanded, concurrent with the reduction of non-urgent services such as general, ENT and vascular surgery, as well as reducing cardiac and cancer surgery ‘as the situation develops’.
Furthermore, it is also recommended that, in the event the outbreak escalates to emergency level, the care patients receive should be determined by the resources available, rather than upon the health requirements in each individual case.
Mass Murder By Government Policy
All of which is starkly reminiscent of this three minute video, in which Dr Luke Evans MP introduces his questions for Hancock [in the House of Commons April 2020 inquiry into COVID-19] with the following statement:
“A Good Death requires three things…”
Those three things which Evans says every ‘Good Death’ requires are having enough syringes, enough Midazolam and Morphine and enough staff to administer the fatal doses of the drugs prescribed, within a supposedly ethical framework which repeatedly recommends scaling up End of Life Care, whilst denying critical care to the very people who were forced to sign Do Not Resuscitate notices before they were incapacitated with opiates and Midazolammed into premature death.
Nevertheless, it is immaterial whether they call it ‘A Good Death’ or not because what it all amounts to is yet more prima facie evidence of mass murder by UK Government policy, all of which substantiates the allegations in PUB’s Private Criminal Prosecution of the Four Horsemen and their accomplices.
PUB To Lay Charges of Mass Murder
By Government Policy
https://thefreedomcycle.com/pub/
https://tinyurl.com/rbn8btvh
Lawyers send open letter to UK Gov., Hancock, Whitty, & Vallance demanding answers on alleged mass murder in care homes through the use of Midazolam
BY DAILY EXPOSE ON AUGUST 17, 2021 • ( 17 COMMENTS )
An investigation launched by a team of lawyers and experts into the use of midazolam during the Covid-19 pandemic has now concluded in line with how matters should be conducted by the police. The team now has an extensive list of questions that they have put forward to the Government and its advisors, and will proceed with a private criminal prosecution if they do not get the answers they need.
In March 2020 the British people were ordered to stay at home, to protect the NHS, and save lives. But in reality the evidence suggests that the British people were ordered to stay at home, so the NHS could give midazolam to the elderly and vulnerable and pretend that they were Covid-19 deaths.
Here’s a quick run-down of some of the evidence –
Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care, think of it as diazepam on steroids.
Midazolam is also a drug that has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA.
UK regulators state that you should only receive midazolam in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops.
This is because Midazolam can cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death.
At the start of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic Matt Hancock ordered a two year supply of Midazolam and then went back to France for more.
This was confirmed in a parliamentary committee meeting which included Hancock, Professor Van Tam, and Tory MP; Dr Luke Evans, who said a “good death” needs three things, one of those things being Midazolam.
At the same time Hancock and the Government changed the law on the certification of deaths under the guise of the coronavirus act.
And the law on cremations; removing the need for a confirmatory medical certificate.
And the law on indemnity for health service activity.
And the law on visiting loved ones in care homes; which was banned.
April and May 2020 saw a huge spike in deaths occurring in care homes, many were attributed to Covid-19.
In late 2020 the Care Quality Commission found 34% of Health and Social Care workers said they had felt pressured to place ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders on care home residents without informing the resident or their loved ones.
An Amnesty report also found the blanket use of DNR orders in Care homes.
The two-year supply of Midazolam purchased at the beginning of the alleged pandemic was gone by October.
What happened to all of the Midazolam?
Over the last 12 months, Lawyers of Light, PUB, and the amazing polymath, Mark Oakford, have interrogated community prescribing of the respiratory depressing drug, Midazolam.
Following receipt of eye witness statements of the misuse of Midazolam in care homes since April 2020, it became apparent that Midazolam had played a nefarious role in excess deaths, which were then conveniently labelled as Covid-19.
The parties above set about looking at Midazolam prescribing into the community since April 2020, and during their investigations it became evident that a criminal prosecution was necessary regarding the (alleged) misuse of Midazolam, seemingly by government diktat.
Despite the parties above providing some of their acquired evidence to a senior police officer some time ago, the police have seen fit to ignore the same, and refuse to carry out a full investigation. This is despite the reopening of the Gosport inquiry, codenamed Operation Magenta. If you are unaware, Gosport Memorial Hospital had at least 456 patients who died under the care of ‘Dr Opiate’ who was found guilty of misconduct but not struck off.
So, despite Doctor induced death being very real, as proven by the tragedy of Gosport, it seems the police in this country are unwilling to entertain that similar practices have been enacted during the “pandemic”.
This leaves no option but to commence a private criminal prosecution, (PCP), to achieve justice for those who have died at the hand of Midazolam.
In advance of laying the PCP, and in the interests of transparency and justice, the above parties have seen fit to ask questions of ministers and others seemingly involved in this matter.
Given the gravity of the concerns and questions asked, the above parties have concluded that their letter should be an open one. It is in the public interest and for public safety, that everyone know the issues and the questions that have been put forward.
Given this, they have released a copy of the open letter which can be found here.
The PCP will commence after a suitable time period has expired to receive answers from those addressed in the letter.
https://tinyurl.com/4xm2ffv5 https://tinyurl.com/t3bb8e69
Lawyers worldwide submit new evidence to International Criminal Court alleging World Leaders & Scientific Advisors have used Covid-19 & the Injections to commit Genocide and Crimes against Humanity
BY DAILY EXPOSE ON AUGUST 18, 2021 • ( 17 COMMENTS )
New evidence, including sworn affidavits from leading experts such as Professor Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court by lawyers in several countries alleging Government’s across the world and their advisors are complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.
Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a 27-page ‘Request for Investigation’ to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague back in April 2021 alleging the UK Government and its advisors were complicit in crimes against humanity in the name of Covid-19.
On the 28th of April 2021, the pair received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number – ‘141/21’. Since then the pair have been gathering new evidence to use in their ICC claim and have established connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.
A new press release released on the 17th August, which can be viewed here, https://tinyurl.com/wzhmtzww confirms that the pair have received sworn affidavits from leading experts including research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.
Professor Luc A Montagnier, who won a Nobel prize for his work on the HIV virus, claimed in April 2020 that he believed the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Then in May 2021 the expert virologist stated that “Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants”.
A new claim has also been submitted to the ICC due to the vast amount of new evidence and information that has come to light in the past few months, and the lawyers say they now have compelling evidence that “the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons that have been released in two phashes on unsuspecting peoples of the world”.
Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum have also confirmed that they have now be joined by lawyers who have filed similar Requests for Investigation to the International Criminal Court, in France, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Because of this a letter was sent to the ICC on the 12th August 2021 requesting they all be allowed to submit a joint claim, whilst also submitting preliminary evidence for the allegations common to everyone across the world, and requesting the right to have claims specific to individual countries also investigated by the ICC.
One request specific to the United Kingdom is an examination of genocide of the elderly and vulnerable that took place in care homes and hospitals through the inappropriate use of midazolam and morphine. Another investigation specific to this issue has also now concluded and a private criminal prosecution will proceed against the UK Government, Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty and others if the team of lawyers and experts who have carried out the investigation do not receive satisfactory answers to the extensive questions that have been forwarded to the aforementioned in an open letter sent on the 17th August 2021.
Whilst in the joint claim between lawyers from several countries they have requested that there be an immediate suspension on the entire Covid-19 injection programme and an end to the testing of asymptomatic people.
The lawyers say that they now eagerly await the decision of the International Criminal Court as to whether they will allow a joint claim by several countries to be made and accept the Request for Investigation.
They have made it clear to the ICC that due to the escalating medical apartheid, the loss of basic freedoms and rights, and the ever-increasing, very high number of deaths and serious adverse events suffered by recipients of Covid-19 injections, that there is an urgent need for the Court to act swiftly and without further delay.
To that end the lawyers have requested a meeting at the Hague as soon as is practicable.
Whilst awaiting the response Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum have confirmed they are in discussions with lawyers in other countries who have not yet filed their individual Requests to the ICC, but have indicated they wish to join them, and will issue an update as and when there is further news.
https://tinyurl.com/bx5c7hfy
British Brainwashing Corporation.
Turn off the TV and embrace life.
Excellent article and fascinating comments. Thank you. It makes me angry to read how we’ve been played for years but knowledge is power. Maybe if enough wake up, things will have to change.
Thanks Alison. Yes Let’s hope so.
Just a Reminder about the Pandemic
Just a reminder… a genuinely deadly pandemic doesn’t require 24/7 advertising to remind you it exists. Real pandemics don’t need marketing campaigns and endless propaganda… but, psychological operations do.
Global Financial Reset: Are you awake? This is the biggest transfer of wealth in human history happening right now. They want you to focus on the plandemic while they reset the financial system. https://greatawakening.world/reset1
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/08/23/indian-bar-association-charges-who-chief-scientist-for-mass-murder/
Indian Bar Association Charges WHO Chief Scientist for Mass Murder
August 23, 2021
Indian Bar Association Charges WHO Chief Scientist for Mass Murder
Paul Craig Roberts
As I posted this morning, Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis pulled the rug out from under the lying scum that constitutes the American medical establishment by establishing throughout Florida medical centers that cure Covid instead of spreading it with vaccination. Now it has happened again. This time in faraway India.
The Indian Bar Association is charging WHO chief scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan with the mass murder of Indians. Dr. Swaminathan spoke against the use of Ivermectin in the Tamil Nadu province with the consequence that Ivermectin’s use was blocked and Covid cases skyrocketed with deaths increasing ten-fold.
In the provinces where Ivermectin was used—Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa— Covid cases declined sharply by 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%. This success, which cleared large areas of India from Covid, was kept from you by the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, AMA, Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, and the rest of the criminals who control the narrative.
Acting for the Indian Bar Association, Dipali Ojha said the WHO official is accused of misconduct because she used her position as a public health official to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an Emergency Use Authorization for the lucrative vaccine industry.
Dipali Ojha further stated that the Indian Bar Association is bringing action under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person who died due to obstruction of treatment of Covid patients with Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death or life imprisonment.
Well, finally, the beginning of accountability for the orchestrated “Covid Pandemic.” As I have emphasized for some months, Dr. Fauci, NIH, CDC, WHO, FDA, the presstitutes, and the politicians have used Covid to kill and injure large numbers of people for the sake of billions of dollars in Big Pharma vaccine profits. The health authorities, whore media, and scum politicians have lied through their teeth and prevented the use of known, safe cures. Not a single person needed to die or have health impaired by the virus. They were murdered in order to generate fear and panic to drive vaccine profits, insure the destruction of civil liberty, and perhaps serve the darker agenda of population reduction.
Here is a report of the legal action taken against WHO officials: https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/indian-bar-association-sues-who-scientist-over-ivermectin/article_f90599f8-c7be-11eb-a8dc-0b3cbb3b4dfa.html
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the American Bar Association had the integrity and courage to bring charges against, or at least sue, Fauci, Walensky, FDA, NIH, CDC, the governor’s who criminally imposed lockdowns and harmful mask mandates, and the criminal medical organizations and associations that aided and abetted mass murder by blocking Ivermectin and HCQ and punished the doctors who saved lives by prescribing these totally safe medications.
We are faced with the situation in which official government and private organizations in the US, UK, and EU are greater mass murderers than Pol Pot! And nothing will be done about it. The West is so undemocratic that accountability is impossible.
The criminals in charge are about to illegally bestow final approval on the killer vaccines so that they can continue serving their agendas with mass inoculation with a vaccine that is known both to kill and to spread the virus.
This is a good website to add to your Internet reading
https://hannenabintuherland.com
Hi Iain,
I have done a great deal of research with regards to mortality in Dorset. In comparison to the years 2015-19 there was a 2% increase in deaths in 2020. Over the same period the population of the county has risen by 2%, and covid was mentioned in 2% of the deaths. The most marked change was where deaths were recorded. Deaths in the home are 286% above the 5 year average, and this was a constant figure with no peaks or troughs. I am waiting on some information, but will be publishing a full report in the near future.
Hi John. This is an stark anomaly that requires explanation. I don’t see how the government can maintain their silence on this issue. Clearly something isn’t right and I eagerly anticipate your report. Please let me know as soon as it is ready. Are you familiar with the recent work of John Dee (pseudonym)? It has significant ramifications for the mortality claims and the statistical reporting of mortality. There is a recent UK Column article here you may be interested in: – https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/there-is-no-pandemic