The label of “Conspiracy Theorist” is used today to describe pretty much everyone who challenges the preferred narratives, policies and actions of the State. But how did this term become weaponised and is what we are told about those labelled with it plausible?
In the second part of this series we examine the official data surrounding the coronavirus pandemic. Focusing on the UK we look at where the response has come from and the global forces behind the lockdown policy. If you are prepared to look beyond the fear porn what will you find?
The coronavirus lockdown narrative is clear but can we trust what we are told and what are the reasons we might questions the State’s coronavirus lockdown. In the first part of this 2 part series we look at the some of the ways we have been deceived and consider if the cure isn’t worse than the disease.
Fact Checkers claim they check facts for you, so you don’t have to. The dictionary definition of a fact is: Something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof…
We are constantly reminded how lucky we are to live in a representative democratic State. The State exists to facilitate people power, enabling the people to decide what policies the State pursues. But is any of this even remotely plausible. Why do we believe in the State?
Conspiracy theory has become a dirty term. It suggests people called conspiracy theorists believe all manner of falsehoods. They are dangerous subversives or complete idiots (one of the two.) But what if conspiracy theory is true. What can we glean from this world view.
The sortition movement, for want of a better name, promises to deliver us to a democratic nirvana. All across the world, citizen’s assemblies are springing into existence, at the same time, as if by magic. Is it reasonable to question this allegedly grass roots, movement of the people? Yes! Absolutely. Read here to find out why.
Consopiracy theory is a consequence of warped psychology according to recent academic research from a team of psychologists at the University . We explore the numerous logical fallacies within this flawed pseudoscience and ask if it is the researchers own psychological problems which underpins it.
We look at the evidence of systemic regulatory failures of vaccines in Part 4. What influence does profit have on decision making and what evidence is there that some vaccines are both unnecessary and unsafe?
Are all vaccines effective, are they all safe and how do we know? An exploration of the problems establishing vaccine efficacy & safety and consideration of research funding.